From Journalism to Film: Q and A with Grant Reed
Posted by davis on 11 Jun 2010 | Tagged as: True Stories, Show Biz
I got such a nice response a few months ago when I posted a “Q and A” with former HTVer Ashley Reynolds, now a professional TV reporter in Kentucky, that I thought I’d tap into my alumni network once again.
This time I visited with Grant Reed, a 2007 grad who is now working on a degree in film at Chapman University in southern California. Grant was the News Director of “HTV Magazine” his senior year, and won several national honors for his broadcast journalism efforts. But now he is pursuing his passion, which is making movies. I wanted to check in with him about the film track he has chosen, and pick his brain a bit. So read on and learn from someone not that far removed from his high school broadcasting experience:
You are attending Chapman University in the southern California. That seems like a huge leap from Springfield, MO. How did you decide to go there, and how has it worked out so far?
Deciding to go to school in California was a very big decision, but it felt like the right one (and still does). I had an interest in film ever since I was little and created shorts with my grandmother’s videocamera. You know, the one with the tapes that fit into a specialized VHS tape. So my interest had been growing for a long time. By the end of my first year on the staff of HTV, I knew that I wanted to study film. When I began researching schools, and asking around for advice from people in the field, the big topic that kept coming up was “connections.” In the film industry, the pay scale isn’t based on how many years of school you’ve had. You get a job if you have experience and you’re known to be reliable, and you need people who can verify that. I knew that if I stayed in Missouri, or the midwest, for that matter, that I would be at a disadvantage if I decided to move to LA at a later date. So I began researching film schools in California. I was attracted to Chapman because you start the major as a freshman, unlike many of the other programs, including those at UCLA and USC. I visited the campus while on a trip to the STN Convention, and I fell in love with the campus. The school is small, and the surrounding area is fairly quiet, which provided a smoother transition from Springfield. I’ve had a great time so far, and I’m very happy I made the decision I did.
You just directed a student film, “Yes Man.” What were some of the obstacles you didn’t anticipate, or any surprises along the way as you finished the project?
The biggest issue: money. Films are not cheap. I’m very grateful to have very supportive parents who believe in what I’m trying to do. My film was done for a class called Advanced Production, which is biggest production class you take before your thesis. My film was only 10 minutes, but it took three days to shoot. I had to feed my crew all three days, I had SAG actors, so I had to pay for SAG insurance, two of the locations where we shot wouldn’t allow us to plug anything into their outlets, so we had to rent a generator. We also rented a lot of extra equipment. The school provides a camera and some minimal equipment, which is very helpful, but a lot of times it isn’t enough. We also shot on film, so there were processing fees, costs for transferring the footage, extra. There are a lot of small things that add up. But if you’re satisfied with the end results (as I was), then that struggle is justified.
You were a busy broadcast student in high school, shooting, editing, and leading a very successful news staff. What lessons from your broadcast journalism experience have helped you in your work as a film director/student?
Although broadcast journalism and narrative film are two very distinct mediums, both rely on telling a powerful story. Working on HTV, I learned how to create a compelling story out of interviews and B-roll. With film, you’re creating the story ahead of time, and planning everything in advance. But broadcast journalism gave me a great advantage in knowing what will be effective for the audience. And one of the rules that made me hate Coach so many times was “Kill the puppies,” and it is also one of the rules that has helped me tremendously in film school. For my Advanced Production, there was a 10 minute limit for the screening. Our first cut was 13 minutes. I ended up cutting out an entire scene, and cut out enormous portions of others. And it ended up being a better story because of it. There was no excess. I included what was needed for emotion of the story, and cut out the rest. And in world of films where studios rule, no one is going to say, “I liked it, but I wish the movie was a little longer.” You’re always going to be asked to make cuts. So, as much as it hurts to “kill the puppies”, it is ultimately for the better.
A lot of high school students are interested in film, but may have limited opportunities to get involved. Any suggestions for them as they consider movie-making as a career?
The great thing about today is that anyone can be a producer. With sites like Youtube and Vimeo, and the low cost of digital cameras, filmmaking is no longer restricted to those with large budgets. Don’t wait to go to film school. I surely didn’t. I was creating music videos and participating in short film contests like the local SATO48 here in Springfield, and that experience has been very valuable. There was almost no crew, just me, a camera, some co-writers, and a few actors. And that was all we needed.
Finally, who are the filmmakers you look up to, and how important is it for young directors to study the work of others?
My favorite filmmaker would have to be Paul Thomas Anderson, director of “There Will Be Blood”, “Boogie Nights”, “Magnolia”, and “Punch Drunk Love.” All of his films are focused on characters, and telling their stories. Unlike many films today, he doesn’t rely on action sequences or gimmicks to keep the audience’s attention. His great strength is in making the audience care for these (sometimes selfish and outrageous) characters, and I greatly admire him for that. When it comes to a film that most represents my style of filmmaking, I would have to choose “Election” directed by Alexander Payne. That film is brilliant. It takes the simple premise of a high school election, and turns it into a scathing satire with a sharp script, hilarious but believable performances, and a fast pace that keeps the audience invested. I think humor is a great medium for the discussion of serious issues, and that has become my goal as a filmmaker: to entertain the audience without that entertainment being mindless, as much of it is today (we have Michael Bay and reality TV to blame for that).
Comments Off